Post by Charlie Drummond on Oct 17, 2010 11:29:39 GMT -4
Alright, I hate being on the other end of this and answering one million questions (from each juror), so i'm going to keep this really simple.
For both of you: I want you to tell me the biggest move you made in this game. If it was making an alliance, don't bother. I want to know a specific move you made that you would consider the biggest.
Now one personal question and/or request for both of you:
Sophie: Please give me a play-by-play of your game from the beginning to now and what your strategy was to get here. Did you play as you go or did you have a specific plan you played with? If you give a play-by-play in your soon-to-come Opening Statement, disregard that part. Basically, I just want to get a feel on what you did, when you did it, and why. This doesn't have to be gigantic or too long, like I said, I know what it's like to be on that end. I just want the basics.
Also, do you feel you played a little too UTR?
John James: You said in your Opening Statement that "[you] were a complete dick and played with people's emotions." UHM, HELLO!!!! [/jerseyshoreangelina] Do you realize you're trying to win the Jury over right now?
I'm going to keep it blunt, your Opening Statement was garbage and i'm one of the few people who it seemed you had a shot at getting a vote from, and I think you may have threw it away with that. How the HELL is that a selling point to get juror votes? "Being a dick and playing with people's emotions" and manipulation/strategy are two totally different things first off, and you used it as if it's a reason to vote for you when it certainly isn't. So please explain this.
Thanks, may the best person win.
For both of you: I want you to tell me the biggest move you made in this game. If it was making an alliance, don't bother. I want to know a specific move you made that you would consider the biggest.
Now one personal question and/or request for both of you:
Sophie: Please give me a play-by-play of your game from the beginning to now and what your strategy was to get here. Did you play as you go or did you have a specific plan you played with? If you give a play-by-play in your soon-to-come Opening Statement, disregard that part. Basically, I just want to get a feel on what you did, when you did it, and why. This doesn't have to be gigantic or too long, like I said, I know what it's like to be on that end. I just want the basics.
Also, do you feel you played a little too UTR?
John James: You said in your Opening Statement that "[you] were a complete dick and played with people's emotions." UHM, HELLO!!!! [/jerseyshoreangelina] Do you realize you're trying to win the Jury over right now?
I'm going to keep it blunt, your Opening Statement was garbage and i'm one of the few people who it seemed you had a shot at getting a vote from, and I think you may have threw it away with that. How the HELL is that a selling point to get juror votes? "Being a dick and playing with people's emotions" and manipulation/strategy are two totally different things first off, and you used it as if it's a reason to vote for you when it certainly isn't. So please explain this.
Thanks, may the best person win.