|
Post by Sunshine Martyn on Aug 24, 2010 13:40:50 GMT -4
Hello, Charlie.
Please explain your thoughts on the nominees, and list the pros and cons of both nominees.
Then, cast your vote to evict.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Drummond on Aug 25, 2010 11:56:09 GMT -4
Well this is the first eviction, but I don't think the decision is that hard for anyone in the house. Then again, there are some assholes here that will do shit just to "spice" things up or get TV time, so it wouldn't surprise me to see the good person evicted.
I've never talked with Enzo. He seems to be distant from the entire house.
I've talked with Kris a couple of times and he is my roommate, and I think he's pretty cool.
If I keep Enzo around, he will continue to be almost nonexistant in the house, and being more nonexistant than me and Kris at this point is saying something. But, if he stays around, it's more likely to buy me some time in the game.
Keeping Kris keeps in a potential ally for me, and also someone I think I could stay over if I was on the chopping block with them. However, he has more potential to be a threat than Enzo.
This all being said..... the decision is clear.
I vote to evict Enzo.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Drummond on Sept 5, 2010 16:30:02 GMT -4
If I keep Rachael in the house, her antics will continue to piss people off, and it will keep the two sides in the house going after each other and not after little old me.
If I get rid of her, it gets a bigger threat out of the game competition-wise.
If I keep Natalie, it would benefit me because I talk to Natalie on a regular basis compared to a lot of the others, and I really like Natalie.
If I get rid of Natalie, it would keep the drama in the house, but also probably increase the odds of me going up on the block.
I vote to evict Rachael.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Drummond on Sept 16, 2010 14:38:02 GMT -4
If I keep Ragan in the house, him and Charley will hopefully think i'm still working with them, fight hard in the competitions, and keep me around. If I keep Natalie, we have an "alliance", so if she were to keep her word, she would keep me around. If I got rid of Natalie, it would get rid of a semi-floater who I do feel like is playing everyone at least a little bit. If I were to vote out Ragan, it takes out Charley's main life support and ally in those house, and a huge potential social and competition threat for the rest of this entire game. I vote to evict Ragan.
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Drummond on Sept 20, 2010 13:03:51 GMT -4
If I keep Charley in the house, it will reestablish my trust with her and she will never nominate me as I'm pretty much all she has left. Also, she would continue to create drama amongst people and keep the focus off of me, as well as having a huge target on her back if I were to go on the block against her.
If I get rid of Charley, I will be doing what the house wants, which may be best for me at the moment. I will keep people happy and that's all I can do when everyone wants to evict Charley anyway.
If I keep Jen in this game, she has been deemed a "floater" and will likely be on the block several more weeks before she is evicted, if she's not just evicted next week if she stays. In addition, she can't compete in any Veto competitions, which puts me in a better position should I find myself on the block from here on out, especially if it's against her. Also, from what I understand, her social game is lacking, so I think socially I could campaign much harder than she could.
If I get rid of Jen, it gets rid of someone that could potentially be targeted and keeps Charley in the house, who oddly enough has turned into a non-entity.
Oddly enough, Charley is following in Sam's footsteps tenfold. I don't know if she lost all hope and desire to be here once Ragan was evicted or what the deal is, but following Ragan's eviction, Charley hasn't even shown up. It's weird that Sam and Charley, both of opposing alliances and both huge presences in this game, ironically enough miss competing and campaigning the weeks they need to do it most. Quite interesting.
In the end, I have decided what is best for myself.
And because of that....
I vote to evict Charley
|
|
|
Post by Charlie Drummond on Sept 26, 2010 3:44:52 GMT -4
The pros of keeping Natalie in this game are that she claims to be my alliance and will help me out if she wins an HoH, hopefully.
The cons of keeping Natalie are she obviously might have alliances with a lot of people as I know she was saying to Charley and them that she was working with them, said she's working with me, and now told John James she is working with him. She can't possibly be working with all of these people, or she's playing everyone.
The pros to keeping Jen.... damn, too many to list. She's hated. She can't win any PoV comps. She can't win any HoH competitions, at least she hasn't so far. She will keep me safe if she does stumble upon an HoH win and start taking out the obvious alliance in the house for me.
The negatives to keeping Jen? Can't say there really are any.
I promised Natalie my vote to stay, but you know what? I lied. She's the bigger threat and does most likely have multiple alliances. Why would I want her here?
However, after Jen's dramatics, she is most likely staying anyway.
Therefore, I vote to evict Natalie.
|
|